A recurrent blog theme is the opportunity to learn across domains. How can players learn from a K-drama ("Misaeng: Incomplete Life") where the hero arrives at a trading company with no domain or work experience?
Think back to your early volleyball experiences - no platform skills, awkward serving, embryonic footwork. As you evolve, you grow skills, game understanding, physical and emotional maturity. If you can do that for volleyball, why not at home, in class, and in your first jobs?
Here's a "hallucination" from Claude.ai about one "hero journey" where the protagonist begins alone, isolated with no allies or mentors. Yet he grows and persists.
I'm not recommend a watch, but a study of the narrative arc.
Geu-rae is a great case study precisely because he flips the usual leadership assumption on its head — competence isn't the gate, character is the engine that builds competence over time. Here are the leadership lessons that come out of his journey:
1. Attitude is trainable before skill is.
Geu-rae can't do the technical parts of the job when he starts, but he can control his attitude, effort, and honesty completely. Leaders who wait for someone to be "ready" before investing in them get the sequence backwards. The people worth developing often show the trainable traits — coachability, humility, follow-through — long before they show the trainable skills.
2. Process discipline (his baduk/go background) transfers across domains.
Geu-rae's years studying Go didn't teach him office work, but they taught him how to read a position, think several moves ahead, stay calm under pressure, and learn from a loss without collapsing. The lesson for leaders: don't just evaluate direct experience — look for transferable discipline. Someone's rigor in one domain often predicts how they'll operate in a new one.
3. Psychological safety unlocks effort; contempt shuts it down.
The contrast between Sang-sik (Geu-rae's team lead, who is demanding but fair and invested) and the higher-ups who dismiss Geu-rae for his background is the show's central leadership tension. Sang-sik gets more out of Geu-rae not by lowering standards but by making it safe to fail, ask questions, and try again. Leaders who signal contempt for someone's starting point guarantee they'll never see that person's ceiling.
4. Accountability without excuse-making is a competitive advantage.
Geu-rae almost never blames circumstances. When he screws up, he owns it and adjusts. This matters for leaders because it's rare and it's a strong predictor of long-term development — someone who metabolizes failure into correction improves faster than someone equally talented who externalizes blame.
5. Merit systems have to be built, not assumed.
A recurring theme is that "meritocracy" at the company is aspirational, not real — plenty of decisions run on pedigree and politics, not demonstrated ability. The leadership lesson: fair evaluation doesn't happen by default. Leaders have to actively build structures that let character-and-effort candidates get evaluated on their actual output, or the informal hierarchy will just reproduce itself.
6. Small, consistent wins compound into trust.
Geu-rae doesn't have a single heroic moment that proves himself. He earns credibility through repeated small deliveries — showing up early, doing the tedious task well, not cutting corners. For leaders, this reframes how you build trust in a new or unproven team member: you don't need to wait for the big test; you accumulate evidence.
7. The team, not just the individual, is the unit of development.
Sang-sik's team functions as a genuine developmental unit — people cover for each other, share credit, and absorb newcomers' mistakes without punishing them publicly. Geu-rae improves faster because he's inside a team culture built for growth, not just inside an org chart.
If it's useful, the throughline for a blog piece could be: competence is a lagging indicator, character is a leading one — which would pair naturally with the Duckworth grit material and the Wooden/Stoic patience piece you've already written, since Geu-rae is basically a live case study in both.
The Misaeng to MVB Message:
Misaeng in the game "Go" describes a stone that is not yet fully alive on the board.
MVB 26 has a team full of players "not fully alive on the board." They move along a high character, high commitment arc that creates possibility.
No comments:
Post a Comment